Are Some Ways of Knowing More Likely Than Others to Lead to Truth? Essay

more or less people commit that money begets the world go round. precisely scholars believe former(a)wise. It is the familiarity of how to acquire wealth and of how to make the most of it is actu some(prenominal)(a)y the decisive factor. Humans couldnt pay off mastered this world with all its richness in resources and mysteries with give away ample knowledge of how to do so. It is the gift of knowledge that has set human races apart from any other living coinages. So it is just proper that scholars delve into per utilise the concept of knowledge for us to understand it better.                        To be more specific, this school of thought is called the system of companionship. surmise of knowledge is besides known as Epistemology. What is so special just about possibleness OF Knowledge is that it is widely considered as the most important sub-field of philosophy. The Theor y of knowledge had made signifi push asidet advancements since it was first formally studied.  But level(p) though it has already presented many different shipway to obtain the honor, many still ask Are some ways of wise(p) more comparablely to be successful to lead to the righteousness than other methods (Ways of Knowing).            Scholars receive dedicated their studies for the further advancement of the Theory of Knowledge. They have bypast through with(predicate) countless debates and research for the advancement of the field. This is beca enjoyment of the demand for better dribbleow intent is ever-increasing as humanity progresses.The truth is what e very(prenominal)one wants.  What makes things severe for scholars studying the Theory of Knowledge is that many philosophers also argue that the truth providenot be contained, it cannot be resolved, it is unattainable. However, the Theory of Knowledge counters the argument by presenting to us louver ways of well-educated that could assist us in obtaining the truth. The five ways of astute ar system of logic, revelation, language, sense, and emotion. Let us give further details about the five ways of knowing and see if one can be the outmatch way of getting to the truth (Butchvarov 1970).Sense            For psychologists, sense or acquaintance pertains to the processes that involve the acquisition, organization, interpretation, and selection of information acquired through the bodily senses.  These conventional senses that we argon familiar with argon namely sight, taste, touch, smell, and receiveing. Sensory information is basically acquired through sensory organs that can be found in the human anatomy.We can be easily familiarized with this particular way of knowing beca apply we ensnare it into use on a daily basis. We use our look to view colors, we can tell the difference in tas te amidst an ice cream and fish, we use our hands to feel rough and still surfaces, we use our ears to listen to music. These are practical things we do everyday that we instal into use to know, to obtain truth (Gibson 1966).            Beyond the five senses that we are familiar with, there are also addition to the classical senses like temperature, balance, pain, and other recently studied sense that would be too expert to discuss in this paper.            Maurice Merleau-Ponty, a French phenomological philosopher, argues that sense is the foundation of all knowledge and sciences. Even though sense itself cannot give meaning to the objects it senses in this world, the person is able to give meaning from his or her own consciousness. The use of the senses requires constant use for it to give meaning to the objects in this world. As we put into practice our senses, we develop what is called m ental models. As the sacred scripture suggests, as sensory information is sent to our learning mogul, we develop models that we can use as bring up if ever the senses encounter the object again. It is like making imprints in our brain about the things around us.            With the use of sense as an feeler to obtaining truth, world can obtain the truth, or at least have an idea, by employ the brains capabilities. In simpler terms, with the use of senses, humans make the full use of what they intrinsically have, our very own bodies.            The only drawback I can offer about using senses to obtain truth is that we cant always gain access to the objects involved in our queries. For guinea pig, if we hear a radio advertisement about ice cream stating that it is sweet, we cant validate the claim since we are only using hearing, we siret actually taste the real thing.Logic             If we go into the etymology of the word logic, we could unearth meanings like reasoning, argument, idea, principle, and thought. It is primarily concerned with the validity of inferences. It is considered a branch of philosophy. Immanuel Kant argued that logic should be a science devoted to studying judgments (Russel 1917).            Logic, like senses, also makes use of the capabilities of the human brain. If we use this as an approach to obtain truth, logic assesses all possible arguments, eliminates all improbable answers to be intimate up with the most convincing.            Logic can be a very efficient way to obtain truth. Actually, it is as used as senses, also in a daily basis.  But oftentimes we deal across things that our minds cant comprehend. This is because logic, like sense, makes use of what we already know.So if we use logic in ques tions about the existence of ghosts, we hastily jump to polish that they dont exist because it defies logic. The problem here is that there are people who believe in the existence of ghosts. So the existence of two different truths makes either feeble. lyric             Language is basically our means of communication. It curiously refers to the use of various forms of communication and the set conventional rules that governs its usage (Crystal 2001).            personally I wouldnt use language to derive truth. Humans have developed the use of language far-off more than any specie could have. Humans have become so adept in using language that we can easily manipulate it. If language is used in combination with logic and reasoning, humans can make truths come out of nowhere. Moreover, there is the concept of lying that can lead us far from the truth.       &n bsp    For example, if there is a trial in court. The lawyers from the two opposing parties have different interest. They defend their arguments with adept use language. The problem may pinch if the innocent party, shall I say was outspoken by the opposing party. then(prenominal) the judge was impressed by the adept use of language raze though the opposing party was just presenting lies all the time, just discourse them in a very eloquent manner. Thus the verdict allow for just be decided by how terminology were used. The verdict impart be considered the truth however it is far from the real thing.Emotion            in that location are so many definitions for the word emotion. Actually, there is no universally agreed term for the word emotion. According to the APA Dictionary of Psychology, it is a multiplex reaction pattern that a person uses to approach a authoritative and personal matter.     &n bsp      Perhaps feelings would make the subject of emotions ofttimes simpler. Feelings are the experiences that come with emotions. Feelings are very useful tools for obtaining truth. Humans have this unexplainable ability to know things just be using their feelings. There are much(prenominal) ambiguous concepts such as gut-feel and motherly instincts (Cornelius 1996). But the problem with using feelings to obtain truth is that emotions and feelings are very prone to be biased. as well as since emotions are complex in nature, it will also provide us complex results. I believe that the truth should be unbiased to begin with it is presented or accepted.            For example, I will use the courtroom scenario again, the truth is that the suspect really did the violation he is accused of. He then delivered a very empathic speech that convinced the jury. The decision of the jury had a great impact on the final verdict . Once again, it failed to obtain truth as the jury felt that the defendant was innocent. After all, a feeling is only a feeling and certainly not necessarily the truth. manifestation            And last but definitely not the least, we have revelation as a way of knowing. Revelation, as the word suggests, is about a disclosure that has been provided by a divine being. What has been disclosed is something initially unknown and farfetched for humans to uncover. We can also call this divine intervention. The realizations and messages disclosed during revelations bestow place the known boundaries of human comprehension.We are familiar with revelations as it happened to the most known prophets that later on became the proponents of the worlds most hot religions. Most of the instance that the revelations happen to the prophets is when they are in a meditating or in a trance state. Some accounts of revelations happen in dreams. But revelati ons are not exclusive to great prophets. Actually there are much many accounts of revelation to normal people (Franz 1975).            Probably the best example of the use of revelations is on the holy books of the worlds most popular religions. These holy books are distributed around the globe in countless copies. The religions heartfelt followers live their lives according to the words of these scriptures. It is because these people believe these words to be the truth.That these words are the very words of God himself. galore(postnominal) may challenge the level of truthfulness of these holy scriptures. But if they take in consideration what weve learned in theory of knowledge, we will break up we shouldnt challenge the validity of these scriptures. We are talking about reliance here, faith is something that cant be easily shattered in spite of appearance a person. When we say that a certain belief is someones faith, that automatica lly counts as that someones truth.Conclusion            Sense and logic could have been the best ways to knowing the truth. However they both fell short as both of them have certain limitations. Both of these ways of knowing is relying much to the capabilities of the brain, which we know as of now is very limited.            Language and emotions are too complex to put into use of obtaining the truth. And the problem was both of them often leads to a biased truth, which we cant categorize as a genuine truth.            As the best ay of knowing the truth, I preferred it through revelation. The other ways of knowing the truth made me fancy how hard it is to obtain truth. Also, the word faith comes with the rod revelation. I believe we should be faithful to what is true. Im aware that it is still difficult to prove revelations through physical evidence. But we dont extremity any of that evidence if we get our goal, the truth. Maybe the truth is really far from the reaches of our comprehension. Maybe if we explore more the possibilities of revelations may it be through religious meditations or simple dreaming.Works CitedButchvarov. The Concept of Knowledge. Evanston, Northwestern University Press. 1970Cornelius, R. The science of emotion. tonic Jersey Prentice Hall. 1996Crystal, David. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge, CambridgeUniversity Press. 2001Gibson, James J. The Senses Considered as perceptual Systems. Boston. 1966Raymond Franz. The Appropriate Time for God to Act. Crisis of Conscience,.1975. pp. 237253Russell, Bertrand. Mysticism and Logic. London. Allen and Unwin. 1917Ways of Knowing. Problems of Knowing and Linking Questions. 7 January 2008<http//www.amyscott.com/WAYS%20OF%20KNOWING%20LInking.com>